maflynn
Apr 14, 04:20 PM
Awesome thanks for the link.
shadowfax
Jun 30, 10:29 AM
Originally posted by iJon
well i use to charge through the wall but with the new ipods its little more difficult than that because i gotta go behind my computer and unplug the cable since the ipods use a new cable. it should take 3 hours to charge fully. if nots charging in that amount of time i would say go for the wall. lol iJon, i got a spare cable for that reason, so i can keep one attached to the power supply. it's too bad, really....
well i use to charge through the wall but with the new ipods its little more difficult than that because i gotta go behind my computer and unplug the cable since the ipods use a new cable. it should take 3 hours to charge fully. if nots charging in that amount of time i would say go for the wall. lol iJon, i got a spare cable for that reason, so i can keep one attached to the power supply. it's too bad, really....
AndrewR23
Apr 23, 02:54 PM
Mine is not like that at all and it is a 5K replacement. I would say yours isn't that bad. Trust me, you could get a lot worse in another replacement.
Mitthrawnuruodo
May 14, 06:29 PM
But I finally found my all-time favorite website for when you need a laugh (http://www.sump.no/) - I had lost the bookmark/link, but after some searching I found it... :o
Joe Bannon
Feb 20, 10:45 PM
It wont make a difference to from MP3 to AIFF.
To me it sounds like you have some custom equalizer setting in iTunes to boost the bass because afaik it's a straight conversion that Garageband does, ie. what is in the MP3 file gets converted to AIFF. But if you want you can open the MP3 file in Audacity and export it as AIFF and see if there's any difference.
To me it sounds like you have some custom equalizer setting in iTunes to boost the bass because afaik it's a straight conversion that Garageband does, ie. what is in the MP3 file gets converted to AIFF. But if you want you can open the MP3 file in Audacity and export it as AIFF and see if there's any difference.
IJ Reilly
Jan 16, 07:45 PM
Did Randy Newman show up on the exhibit floor by any chance?
geoldr
Apr 13, 11:54 AM
The blog post was from 2 years ago!!!
Right, but judging by the comments, since there was one from yesterday, and January I figured there is still a bug.
And actually, this code did work for me. Because using the default apple code it wouldn't encode the & in URLs and it would mess up my program. But using the code from the blog post it works!
Right, but judging by the comments, since there was one from yesterday, and January I figured there is still a bug.
And actually, this code did work for me. Because using the default apple code it wouldn't encode the & in URLs and it would mess up my program. But using the code from the blog post it works!
VegasMac
Feb 22, 06:35 AM
Thanks guys I just purchased one can't wait to get it. Thread may end now.
Rodimus Prime
Apr 23, 03:26 PM
Yuck doing multi-touch gestures on a crappy plastic trackpad... The experience won't even come close to the glass MBP trackpad ;)
not exactly new. They have been doing the multi touch track pad for years now and now you think they re ripping off macs.....
not exactly new. They have been doing the multi touch track pad for years now and now you think they re ripping off macs.....
labman
May 5, 07:15 PM
FYI thread starter since you seemed to get irritated that you didn't get your answer after 31 minutes. :rolleyes: I would suggest google and searching when asking common questions. you can get your answer in seconds rather then minutes or sometimes hours.
dXTC
Dec 9, 08:18 AM
dXTC likes this too. If my budget would allow it, I'd get a MBP right now. Then again, if my budget was the size of Woz's, I'd already have a couple of them. (And a new iMac and a Mac Mini Server for my iTunes library and...) :)
Outsider
Apr 20, 08:50 AM
The drivers need to be updated to Universal or Intel. It won't work as it stands. Check with the manufacturer to see if they have Intel versions of the drivers that don't rely on Rosetta.
Also, have you tried setting it up with a Generic driver?
Also, have you tried setting it up with a Generic driver?
simsaladimbamba
Apr 30, 06:35 PM
Have you tried running Windows 98 as virtual machine (VM) in Parallels Desktop or VMWare Fusion (both have demos to download) or VirtualBox? Windows 98 software is hardly that demanding, that it needs to run native, I could even run Command & Conquer via VM on my 2007 iMac once or twice.
SuperCompu2
Jun 29, 11:09 PM
Would a Thinkpad T30 work? It's got 512MB RAM, 40GB HD, DVD/CDRW/Floppy hot-swap drives and a base station, along with a power cord or two (I have 4 but I doubt you'd need more than 2)
Let me know!
Let me know!
Liquorpuki
Apr 24, 09:21 PM
He could, but what that would say about his belief iDisk/MobileMe..... would be interesting.
MobileMe is one of the crappiest cloud services out there. I wouldn't be surprised
MobileMe is one of the crappiest cloud services out there. I wouldn't be surprised
windkoh
May 5, 05:35 AM
My MBA is fine, and that certainly doesn't look right. It's still under warranty, so I'd take it into a store or contact customer services
I bought this BTO MacBook Air online and I'm using it everyday. I think it will take time for time replace the keyboard to me. Another thing is... This baby don't have a removable hard drive, it will give me a hard time for transfering files... :(
I bought this BTO MacBook Air online and I'm using it everyday. I think it will take time for time replace the keyboard to me. Another thing is... This baby don't have a removable hard drive, it will give me a hard time for transfering files... :(
DanielCoffey
Apr 21, 03:46 AM
Portal 2 on my 2010 with 5870 plays at 2560x1440 perfectly smoothly on the default graphics which, while not the highest in terms of AA, are very good indeed.
I also noticed that Portal 2 doesn't cause the fans to spin up as much as the old Portal did.
I also noticed that Portal 2 doesn't cause the fans to spin up as much as the old Portal did.
kwiiboy
Apr 12, 06:20 PM
huh?
Why pay $200 to some skecthy website, when you can go to Walmart and pay $200 for the Nokia E71 Straight Talk.
Why would I pay $200 for a phone that doesn't work?
Why pay $200 to some skecthy website, when you can go to Walmart and pay $200 for the Nokia E71 Straight Talk.
Why would I pay $200 for a phone that doesn't work?
lee1210
May 17, 08:37 PM
Thanks, lee1210.
Handy link: Cocoa FAQ
That was the guide i was referring to that's linked in the head of the programming forum. I wanted all the active folk in the programming forum to try to beef that up.
-Lee
Handy link: Cocoa FAQ
That was the guide i was referring to that's linked in the head of the programming forum. I wanted all the active folk in the programming forum to try to beef that up.
-Lee
Loomish
Dec 22, 09:38 PM
CD-RW, not CD-RX. I'm sorry:o It says "Burning the disk failed because this type of CD is not supported. Error: 0x80020043. What am I doing?
Heather
Heather, what is "CD-RX?" I've never heard of that format. Is that interchangeable with CD-RW? The latter is the standard read-write format supported by most burners....
Heather
Heather, what is "CD-RX?" I've never heard of that format. Is that interchangeable with CD-RW? The latter is the standard read-write format supported by most burners....
slooksterPSV
Sep 11, 02:30 PM
I was at home, my sister was watching the news. She had just heard about it. So I got ready and walked to school. When I got there, everyone was talking about what had happened. I went to my first period class (I was in 8th grade). All of my teachers were saying that this was becoming a part of history. I watched the news all day except in one class. The b**** didn't care about the two towers and thought it was nonsense to watch it. When I saw the Towers fall I was in shock, it was like omg. How can a structure like that just go completely down. It was so sad and strange to watch.
Abstract
Oct 24, 06:42 PM
let me see if i understand the resolution thing:
we'll be able to adjust the resolution of monitors to really high settings, but instead of everything having to be tiny (windows, menus, text, etc.), we'll be able to make them normal size without them looking crappy? sounds awesome to me.
You can't adjust a monitor so that it has a higher resolution than it inherently does. However, if you have a high res screen, it can behave at (seemingly) lower resolutions (eg: it can operate at a size similar to 1280x800 on the MacBook), except that it would be sharper than a MacBook's screen because the screen has 1920 x 1200 pixels trying to create a desktop size equivalent to 1280x800. So instead of the 110 dpi LCD screens we have now when a 1920x1200 screen operates as a 1920 x 1200 screen, it would operate with a dpi of like 150 dpi if a 1920x1200 resolution LCD was working to create a desktop similar to a 1280 x 800 workspace.
***But again, correct me if I'm either wrong, or not entirely correct, because I want to understand this as well. :)
But like MarkCollette said, this resolution independence thing does scare me a bit as well. I want things to looks smaller if I have a resolution independent screen. Sure I wouldn't want text to be so small that I can't read it, but if they had a way to scale the text larger while leaving other elements nice and small, it would be rather ace.
we'll be able to adjust the resolution of monitors to really high settings, but instead of everything having to be tiny (windows, menus, text, etc.), we'll be able to make them normal size without them looking crappy? sounds awesome to me.
You can't adjust a monitor so that it has a higher resolution than it inherently does. However, if you have a high res screen, it can behave at (seemingly) lower resolutions (eg: it can operate at a size similar to 1280x800 on the MacBook), except that it would be sharper than a MacBook's screen because the screen has 1920 x 1200 pixels trying to create a desktop size equivalent to 1280x800. So instead of the 110 dpi LCD screens we have now when a 1920x1200 screen operates as a 1920 x 1200 screen, it would operate with a dpi of like 150 dpi if a 1920x1200 resolution LCD was working to create a desktop similar to a 1280 x 800 workspace.
***But again, correct me if I'm either wrong, or not entirely correct, because I want to understand this as well. :)
But like MarkCollette said, this resolution independence thing does scare me a bit as well. I want things to looks smaller if I have a resolution independent screen. Sure I wouldn't want text to be so small that I can't read it, but if they had a way to scale the text larger while leaving other elements nice and small, it would be rather ace.
Cerender
Oct 26, 03:42 PM
made it and in line...:)
lsvtecjohn3
Mar 8, 08:19 PM
what's going on here?
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий